Re: [TF-PP] Zero-length paths (ACTION-251)

On 6/8/2010 3:41 PM, Gregory Williams wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>> An idea: We could define ?x :p{0} ?x as matching subjects+objects, and ?x :p{0} :uri to match URI :uri regardless (and all the subjects+objects but that's not gong to change the matches).  Explicit mention adds to the set of possibilities.
>
> Seems like a reasonable solution (if a bit more cumbersome to describe).

Agreed on both counts.

Lee

>
> .greg
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 8 June 2010 20:59:55 UTC