- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@cwi.nl>
- Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 15:40:40 +0200
- To: DENOUAL Franck <Franck.Denoual@crf.canon.fr>
- CC: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Franck, Thanks for this careful review. Regarding your second point: >> 2- Is the problem of introducing the new header >> "Content-Range-Mapping" fixed ? Was raised in : >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-fragment/2010Mar/0155.html > > Still waiting for feedback and an explanation from Yves there. Indeed, the problem is still here and hasn't been fixed. The issue is that a 206 response cannot have new headers (such as 'Content-Range-Mapping'). Therefore, the mapping between a custom unit and bytes should also appear in the 'Content-Range' header, but we still haven't figure out the syntax. As Silvia said, we are waiting for some more feedback from Yves! Raphaël -- Raphaël Troncy EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department 2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France. e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2010 13:42:18 UTC