Re: [ExternalEmail] Re: ISSUE-2 (All processes are systems): All processes are systems [sensor ontology - http://mmisw.org/orr/#http://www.w3.org/2009/SSN-XG/Ontologies/SensorBasis.owl - 09.12.15 ] from Manfred Hauswirth on 2009-12-22 (public-xg-ssn@w3.org from December 2009)

From: Manfred Hauswirth <manfred.hauswirth@deri.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 19:50:02 +0000
To: Laurent.Lefort@csiro.au
CC: Michael.Compton@csiro.au, public-xg-ssn@w3.org
Message-ID: <4B3122EA.3020009@deri.org>

Hi Laurent,

your mail is truly Herculean work :-)

Laurent.Lefort@csiro.au wrote:

> @Manfred: human "sensors" are tricky - I can see many "sensor" 
> properties that they don't have (e.g. it is hard to "calibrate them") 
> and I would not necessarily use an OGC-originated framework to model them.

Agreed.

> @Manfred for an Information Systems ontology check the FRISCO report 
> http://www.mathematik.uni-marburg.de/~hesse/papers/fri-full.pdf
> @Manfred: Does your definition of process correspond to Definition E8: 
> State-transition structure?

Yes.

Cheers,

Manfred

-- 
Prof. Manfred Hauswirth
Digital Enterprise Research Institute (DERI)
National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG)
http://www.manfredhauswirth.org/

Received on Tuesday, 22 December 2009 19:50:42 UTC