- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 09:04:21 +0100
- To: Jo Rabin <jrabin@mtld.mobi>
- CC: Public BPWG <public-bpwg@w3.org>
I also promised to give this some more thought so let me do so before I turn to other matters this morning. Current name: Addendum to Mobile Web Best Practices Suggested alternatives: 1 Extended Evaluations for Mobile Web Best Practices 2 Supplement to Mobile Web Best Practices 3 Clarification of Mobile Web Best Practices 4 Companion to Mobile Web Best Practices 5 Extended Evaluations and Interpretation of Mobile Web Best Practices 6 Mobile Web Best Practices: Beyond mobileOK Basic Tests I like Jo's suggestion (1) however I think it deserves the addition of 'interpretation' as well (5). I am aware that this makes the title far from snappy however it does more fully reflect the document's content since, well, we do interpret some of the BPs, especially where they are applied to more than one URI. 2 - 4 are there to provide something snappy. 6 is also meant to be more snappy and hint at progression from mobileOK (which has always been the motivation for doing this in the first place). HTH Phil. Jo Rabin wrote: > (Continuing our Shakespearian theme) > > As reported by Francois yesterday [1], Philipp Hoschka has requested > that we reconsider the name of the Addendum to BP1 also known as BP1.5 > also known as mobileOK Pro etc. > > Philipp thinks that it sounds too much like we are adding normatively to > BP1 whereas we are not. > > On yesterday's call the gentleman from Suffolk suggested "Supplement" > Eduardo suggested Clarification. > > I'm tempted to go for "Extended Evaluations for Mobile Web Best > Practices". Any takers? Any other suggestions? > > Jo > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2009/10/06-bpwg-minutes.html#item04 > > > > > > -- Phil Archer W3C Mobile Web Initiative http://www.w3.org/Mobile http://philarcher.org
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 08:04:53 UTC