- From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:50:32 +0100
- To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- CC: Liam Quin <liam@w3.org>, public-ietf-w3c@w3.org, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, iesg@ietf.org, Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>
Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > >> Hello Alexey, > Hi Philippe, I've done a detailed review of the 3 registrations. application/xslt+xml and application/xquery+xml look fine to me (I might have some non blocking nits I report separately). I have some further comments regarding application/xquery, I am sorry that I haven't spotted them earlier. So, how do you want to proceed? I suggest that I separate IESG review of application/xslt+xml, from review of application/xquery+xml and application/xquery. This way application/xslt+xml can be approved on September 24th and the remaining 2 can be dealt at a later date. >> I don't see the registration of those media types on the agenda of the >> IESG: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/iesg/agenda/ > > Hi Philippe, > I didn't realize you wanted IESG to approve the updated registration. > >> What is the next step to get those registered? > > I can add this as a management item for the next IESG telechat. After > the telechat I can tell you if there are any comments from IESG.
Received on Monday, 14 September 2009 08:51:47 UTC