- From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:41:28 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Hi Silvia, Silvia Pfeiffer a écrit : >> but it >> seems to me that the important questions are more technical: is this scheme >> good or not, is it too complex to implement or not, should it be profiled or >> not, extended or not ... > > I agree, that is the key question. So, are you aware of any MPEG > implementations that have implemented the fragment addressing schemes? No. > If not, that seems to me to be an indication of it being too complex. I wouldn't jump to that conclusion. There may be other reasons. > Also, it gives us an opportunity to test the scheme that we are > developing within the MPEG communities and potentially develop a more > usable scheme that can be supported by everyone. > > Do you have more information to share on the uptake and use of the > MPEG URI fragment addressing schemes? No. Cyril -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Département Traitement du Signal et Images /Dept. Signal and Image Processing Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://tsi.enst.fr/~concolat
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 07:41:55 UTC