- From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:50:22 +0100
- To: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
- CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Chris Welty wrote: > > Basically we need a pred:literal-not-equal, or at the very least a not= > for each datatype. It seems to make sense to have a pred:literal-equal > as well (for symmetry, if nothing else), but what does it do? Is it > redundant with RIF's = predicate? Does it do numeric comparison? Is it > simply lexical? Why isn't pred:literal-equal not just the boolean completary to pred:literal-not-equal? I mean, don't we have to answer the same question wrt pred:literal-not-equal, whether it does pred:numeric-not-equal or not, etc? Cheers, Christian
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2009 14:51:09 UTC