New draft of mobileOK Scheme 2008-11-06

Hi folks, I have updated the Editor's draft of mobileOK scheme [1] in 
line with the resolutions taken at the F2F. I did not put anything in 
the document about sticking a date in the ALT test for the trustmark as 
I don't recall that actually being a resolution. And anyway, I don't 
understand what that is supposed to represent, how you'd encode it and 
why it would be useful, what effect it would have on the correct use of 
ALT and so on.

I'd like to close out on this by the time mobileOK Basic Tests goes to 
Rec (early Dec). A couple of  further things need sorting out on this:

a) ACTION-869 - Review the mobileOK license in more details and send 
further questions to rigo [on Jo Rabin - due 2008-10-27]

b) RESOLUTION: Dom, Jo and Rigo to form a subcommittee to come back with 
a final proposal to the group within 4 weeks following on from Rigo's 
current proposal.

I'm attending to these now. Meanwhile would appreciate comments on the 
latest draft.

thanks
Jo

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/Drafts/mobileOK-Trustmark/20081106

Received on Thursday, 6 November 2008 16:14:44 UTC