[agenda] CT call Tuesday 15 April 2008

As I write this agenda, the draft has not been published as FPWD yet, 
but that should be done before tomorrow's call.


-----
Chair: François
Staff Contact: François
Known regrets: rob, bryan?, jo

Date: 2008-04-15T1400Z for 60mn
Phone: +1.617.761.6200, +33.4.89.06.34.99, +44.117.370.6152
Conference code: 2283 ("BCTF") followed by # key
IRC channel: #bpwg on irc.w3.org, port 6665.

Latest draft:
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/CT/editors-drafts/Guidelines/080410


Proposed agenda:

1. Doc Status
-------------
- published as FPWD (well, should be)
- next steps:
   * address editorial notes
   * rewrite unclear parts, change doc structure if needed
   * use POWDER?
- other discussions/topics you think we need to have? Any remark on the 
way to proceed?


2. Close without much discussion
--------------------------------
ACTION-625 on fd: Initiate discuss on the exception wording ref 
dangerous content
ACTION-685 on fd: Investigate embedded original headers in altered 
requests (message/http), external ref to original headers 
application/external-body) and/or use of WARNING headers
ACTION-686 on fd: Will organise the next CTTF Editors' meeting
ACTION-731 on jo: Enact changes resolved in this meeting

Check your actions at:
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/products/12


3. Alteration of request bodies (§4.1.2)
----------------------------------------
Last message on the subject:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Apr/0015.html

- no need for examples in the doc?
- something along the lines of (but clearer than!):
"The CT-proxy MUST ensure that preceding transformations stay 
transparent from the point of view of the content provider, and MAY 
change the request method and body of a request that originates from a 
transformed web page accordingly."
- the doc is clumsy on requests that originate from previously 
transformed responses and re-route via the CT-proxy

Related actions:
ACTION-680 on rob: Provide a pseudo-code example of form transformation 
for CT document
-> may not be needed after all
ACTION-681 on fd: Ask aaron kemp for clarification of the character 
encoding issue


4. Linearization or zoom capability (§4.1.2)
--------------------------------------------
raised by SeanP:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Apr/0020.html

- amend/remove it?
- has nothing to do in §4.1 (Proxy treatment of request) anyway, but 
rather in §4.4 (Proxy Response to User Agent)


5. Users preferences
--------------------
- list "request a restructured version of a desktop presentation" as one 
of the examples in 3.2.1?
- append a bullet first list of 4.1.2: "any knowledge it has of user's 
preferences"
- rewrite second point of "Proxies should not alter HTTP requests 
unless" to mention "user's preferences"


6. Control by Administrative or Other arrangements (3.2.3)
----------------------------------------------------------
- out of scope, so, to be consistent, we should only reference Control 
by User and Control By Server no reference to this in other parts of the 
doc: rewrite first bullet in 4.1.2?
- Simplify title to "Control by Other Arrangements"?


7. ACTION-718: Summarize and continue discussion re Ajax/XHR requests
---------------------------------------------------------------------
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Mar/0028.html
- write a note (end of 4.2?) mentioning that responses sent to XHR calls 
should not use a content type that may be subject to transformation?
- append something like "the response contains client-side scripts that 
may break if the page gets adapted" to the list of heuristics in 4.4?


8. New actions needed
---------------------
Remaining editorial notes and issues need to be addressed.
Some are not yet linked to any existing action.


9. AOB
------

Received on Monday, 14 April 2008 12:43:28 UTC