Re: ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit]

I am adding the acknowledgement section today with the answers on this 
thread. So please reply to this thread if you want your name in the 
acknowledgment section (along with the name of the sections that you 
contributed). I will regularly update the ack section, as and when you 
claim your rights in the ack section.

Mary Ellen Zurko wrote:
> Yes, Page Info lives; thanks. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:
> Johnathan Nightingale <johnath@mozilla.com>
> To:
> Web Security Context Working Group WG <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
> Date:
> 03/14/2008 12:03 PM
> Subject:
> Re: ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit]
> 
> 
> 
> Assuming that either Page Info or Identity Signal goes in, I think I
> can lay claim to having specific text in the LC-June document.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Johnathan
> 
> On 14-Mar-08, at 11:33 AM, Web Security Context Working Group Issue
> Tracker wrote:
> 
>>
>> ISSUE-188 (props): xit needs an acknowlegements section [wsc-xit]
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2006/WSC/track/issues/
>>
>> Raised by: Mary Ellen Zurko
>> On product: wsc-xit
>>
>> I suggestion something of this form:
>>
>> This note is created from specific text from x, y, and z, as well as
>> input and discussions among the active participants of the Web
>> Security Context Working Group. It has also benefitted from general
>> public and working group commentary on earlier drafts.
>>
>> We should start tracking x, y, and z in this issue. Off the top of
>> my head, I know that Thomas Roessler, Stephen Farrell, Serge
>> Egelman, and Mary Ellen Zurko have proposed specific text that is
>> currently in the LC-June version. At some point I'll troll through
>> and try to figure out what the full set is, but if you're one, you
>> can save me work by replying to this issue, specifying the text (or
>> section, or issue that had the text).

Received on Friday, 21 March 2008 15:40:26 UTC