ISSUE-33

• From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
• Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:04:52 +0000
• To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
• Cc: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
• Message-Id: <4781EB91-E04B-4D01-AE0C-40B9B1D493CD@deri.org>

Lee, all,

short after Lee dropped out in today's call, we had discussed briefly what to do with ISSUE-33

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/33
"ISSUE-33: Can we use the correct meaning of the full slate of HTTP  errors when specifying the update protocol via WSDL?"


Given the decision to drop WSDL, can we 
a) drop ISSUE-33, or 
b) do we need to reword it instead?

if b) any concrete suggestions for rewording?

Discussion, Opinons welcome!

Thanks,
Axel

Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 16:05:27 UTC