- From: Paula-Lavinia Patranjan <paula.patranjan@ifi.lmu.de>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:38:51 +0100
- To: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu
- Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Hi Michael, during the telecon this week I took the action to contact you for addressing ISSUE-40 [1] on Builtins and logic functions in BLD. Since this issue is a CP one and I did start the list of functions and operators [2] to be considered for BLD, I would be happy to help you towards a proposal for resolving this issue. I've read through the minutes of the last F2F and noticed that there were some discussions on built-ins (such as open list of built-ins vs. fixed, special syntax to identify built-ins or not), but I didn't find information on decisions regarding these issues. Since I couldn't attend the F2F I don't know how to best address the issue of built-ins for BLD. Should we start by choosing from [2] the built-ins to be supported by BLD? Please let me know how we should approach ISSUE-40. We can talked about it over phone if you think it is easier to discuss this than per email. Best regards, Paula [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/40 [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/List_of_functions_and_operators
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2007 07:39:07 UTC