- From: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:55:29 -0400
- To: public-grddl-wg <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>, Dave Beckett <dave@dajobe.org>
Sent on behalf of the WG, text by member Jeremy Carroll: Hi Dave > Are the contents you get when resolving the URI > http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view part of the GRDDL recommendation? > If so, I'd expect the contents to be static and could be hard-coded > into applications. If not static, what are the expected changes? > (Given that above the only allowed changes are defined to not affect > GRDDL processing). > The GRDDL profile URI is a significant URI for the GRDDL > specification, so this is why I want to check if there is > anything special going on with it's use and any contents > that it may contain. To reply directly: a) No, the content of http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view are not part of the GRDDL recommendation? b) We will review and correct the contents of http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view during the candidate recommendation phase (which we hope will be from May 1st to June 1st), after which it should be stable. We will update you when we have done this. c) Applications can behave as if the file had an empty GRDDL result, except when they are explicitly asked for the GRDDL result of this resource. In the latter case, they should do a GET on the URI and apply the usually GRDDL mechanisms. This is the force of the statement in the editor's draft: [[ The namespace document includes RDF data about the terms in the GRDDL Vocuabulary, but these RDF data do not include any triples whose predicate is grddl:profileTransformation. ]] http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#grddlvocab since that is the only type of triple that one would normally have to look for. Does this adequately address your concerns about the namespace document? =========== Jeremy -- -harry Harry Halpin, University of Edinburgh http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 18:55:36 UTC