- From: fantasai <fantasai@escape.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:02:12 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
Bert Bos wrote: > This is the CSS WG's response to an issue you raised on the last CSS > 2.1 draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-CSS21-20030915). We want to > publish CSS 2.1 as a CR in about two weeks. Please let us know this > week if you think our response is wrong. > > Your e-mail: > http://www.w3.org/mid/3F94ECB2.3080503@escape.com > > # See the sections on the width and height of absolutely > # positioned, non-replaced elements for details > > Strike out "non-replaced". > > CSS WG response: > We disagree. I don't see why. The sections on the width and height of absolutely positioned, replaced elements offer details on the interpretation of 'auto' as well. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 13 February 2004 15:03:40 UTC