- From: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:12:08 -0400
- To: "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Just checked in small changes incorporating line item suggestions from Phil, Dan, and Larry. These are not meant to trigger a reread of the document. Jonathan On Mar 9, 2009, at 11:57 PM, Dan Connolly wrote: > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 20:39 +0000, Phil Archer wrote: >> Hi Jonathan, >> >> A couple of things I think I'd expect to see in this doc: > [...] > > One that came to my mind is metalinker: > > http://www.metalinker.org/ > > It's relevant to > "Input to decision to buy, download, or read" > "Links to related documents (prev/next in series, translations, etc)" > > It's mostly information about checksums and mirror sites for reliable > bulk download: > > "Metalink is an open specification that harnesses the speed and > power of > peer to peer networking, FTP, and HTTP with a single click. > > For users and content providers, Metalink makes things simpler, > faster, > and more reliable." > > I haven't studied the P2P aspect of it closely. > > The hook it rides on is MIME types. (application/metalink+xml) > hmm... not registered. > http://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/ > >> Jonathan Rees wrote: >>> Pursuant to ACTION-227, and I hope in time for review prior to the >>> F2F, >>> I put together the following: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2009/02/metadata-survey.html > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E >
Received on Tuesday, 10 March 2009 17:13:37 UTC