- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:19:50 +0000
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Alex Hall <alexhall@revelytix.com>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, RDF Working Group WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 17 Nov 2011, at 19:14, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> The obvious way of getting those into two slots is now to define a “compatibility lexical space” and “compatibility L2V mapping” for rdf:langString. The effect would be that "chat"@en has a normal “RDF lexical form” (“chat”) and a “compatibility lexical form” (“chat@en”). The latter is not part of RDF graphs, but it can be used in “compatibility graphs” or whatever you want to call the two-slot representation. > > That makes sense. I wonder if anyone feels motivated to do it.... Well, ask them – see subject line ;-) Richard
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2011 19:20:19 UTC