Re: ldp-ISSUE-48 (profiles): Profile mechanism is Needed [Linked Data Platform core]

On Jan 31, 2013, at 13:41, "Wilde, Erik" <Erik.Wilde@emc.com> wrote:

> hello david.
> 
> On 2013-01-31 19:27 , "David Wood" <david@3roundstones.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 31, 2013, at 13:18, "Linked Data Platform (LDP) Working Group
>> Issue Tracker" <sysbot+tracker@w3.org> wrote:
>>> ldp-ISSUE-48 (profiles): Profile mechanism is Needed [Linked Data
>>> Platform core]
>>> 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/track/issues/48
>>> 
>>> Could this problem be addressed by simply requiring that LDP servers
>>> either advertise a list of vocabularies they support or a statement that
>>> any vocabularies are acceptable?
> 
> could you say in a little more detail what you have in mind? advertising
> vocabularies on the web is done by advertising media types, which is what
> the original issue was about. if you refer to an RDF-specific mechanism of
> advertising vocabularies, then that may be unnecessary because the
> visibility issue is mostly about making LDP visible and discoverable on
> the web level, and not on the RDF level.

I had in mind a VoID extension, but there are other ways.

Regards,
Dave
--
http://about.me/david_wood


> 
> cheers,
> 
> dret.
> 
>