- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:38:22 -0800
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Nov 29, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:15:20 +0100, Roy T. Fielding > <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote: >> On Nov 29, 2007, at 2:53 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >>> The DOM and other features you mention are part of our charter >>> deliverables, so it would not make sense to remove them from the >>> spec. >> >> Not all deliverables need to be in a single spec. What does need to >> be in the spec is a definition of HTML that does not require a DOM, >> because MOST implementations of HTML processing do not have a DOM. > > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/section- > conformance.html#conformance covers those implementations already. Only if you think it is reasonable for such an implementor to filter through the irrelevant content and reverse engineer a data definition from the normative DOM description. I don't. ....Roy
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2007 23:38:34 UTC