Re: rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-2 (Audience skills): What skills is expected/required from our audience?

* Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com> [2014-11-19 09:07+1000]
> Forgive my ignorance (I am new to W3C processes), but could someone
> explain how such recorded Issues are being usually discussed? I went
> ahead and added a "Related note" to this ticket here, and expected
> an email update to be copied to the mailing list, but this
> apparently hasn't happened. So are we supposed to respond on the
> email list directly?

As far as I know, tracker only send mail when an issue is created. In
general, yeah, use the list. That keeps us from fragmenting
conversations between different media. The issue can hold an index of
the relevant emails.


> Thanks
> Holger
> 
> 
> On 11/19/2014 3:15, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> >rdfdatashapestracker-ISSUE-2 (Audience skills): What skills is expected/required from our audience?
> >
> >http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/2
> >
> >Raised by: Arnaud Le Hors
> >On product:
> >
> >We've started discussing who the audience for Shapes is but what have not discussed what skills the audience is expected to have.
> >We can assume general understanding of the basic RDF data model but what about RDFS, SPARQL, and OWL? Can we expect users of Shapes to be expert in these? Anything else?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 

-- 
-ericP

office: +1.617.599.3509
mobile: +33.6.80.80.35.59

(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.

There are subtle nuances encoded in font variation and clever layout
which can only be seen by printing this message on high-clay paper.

Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 00:06:04 UTC