- From: Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:36:30 -0400
- To: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, "public-vocabs@w3.org Org" <public-vocabs@w3.org>
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:00:03PM +0200, Martin Hepp wrote: > Dear Dan: > > I think the following issue is still open: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-vocabs/2012Apr/0038.html > http://www.w3.org/2011/webschema/track/issues/14 </snip> > 1. Proposed change: > > A simple text amendment for > http://schema.org/True, http://schema.org/False, and http://schema.org/Boolean > would do the trick.: > > Note: The recommended use of this datatype is with a string “true” or “false” indicating the value of the respective property. > Example: > <div itemscope itemtype=" > http://schema.org/Book > "> > <span itemprop="name">The Catcher in the Rye</span> > Family-friendly: <meta itemprop="isFamilyFriendly" content="true"> yes > </div> > > 2. Proposed action: Add this note to > http://schema.org/Boolean +1 to the proposed change and to resolving the issue ASAP This issue came up recently in the schema.org bibliographic extension community[1] and I (at least) am proceeding under the assumption that schema.org will adopt the simple content="true" / content="false" amendment. 1. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-schemabibex/2013Jul/0096.html
Received on Monday, 22 July 2013 19:37:02 UTC