- From: Mobile Web Best Practices Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:40:03 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-bpwg@w3.org
ISSUE-286 (SeanP): Transformation of Mobile Content/Mandating some respect of some heuristics [Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/286 Raised by: Sean Patterson On product: Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies This is a summary of the mailing list discussion of issue of transformation of mobile content. I'm basically including the relevant emails since apparently they were missed by several people due to a misleading title and the fact they appeared on the CT list right as we were switching over to the main BPWG list. The issue was originally raised by Dom on 26 Nov. 2008 in the post titled "Mandating respect of some heuristics": http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Nov/0080.html Some followups were posted by Rotan, Eduardo, Francois, and Tom. (Although in later posts the discussion concentrated on WML content.) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Nov/0085.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Dec/0001.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Dec/0003.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Dec/0004.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Dec/0006.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Dec/0008.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2008Dec/0011.html The first discussion of the issue in a teleconference was on 6 Jan. 2009: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2009Jan/0000.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2009Jan/0008.html Sean made some additional proposals on how to handle transformation of mobile content in this post: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2009Jan/0031.html Responses to this post were made by Luca, Tom, and Eduardo: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2009Jan/0032.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2009Jan/0033.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-ct/2009Jan/0039.html At this point the discussion was moved to the main BPWG list with posts by Sean, Eduardo and Luca: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Jan/0019.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Jan/0021.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2009Jan/0022.html This sums up the current mailing list activity on this subject. Okay; the Holy Roman Empire was neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire. Discuss!
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 14:56:16 UTC