[xsch] a proposal to restructure the note from ewallace@cme.nist.gov on 2004-11-30 (public-swbp-wg@w3.org from November 2004)

From: <ewallace@cme.nist.gov>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 14:37:20 -0500 (EST)
To: pan@cs.man.ac.uk, jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: public-swbp-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200411301937.OAA19109@clue.mel.nist.gov>

Jeremy,

I propose that we break the note you are writing into two parts.  One
part containing the discussion for naming user defined datatypes and 
another which covers value space issues.  It seems to me that the 
former issue is essentially a question of choosing a syntax whereas
the latter issue potentially requires sorting out mathematical, 
computational, and engineering views of valuetypes into a single 
coherent model.  I am worried that packaging these two concerns 
together will arbitrarily link their life cycles, and thus potentially
delay the much needed solution for user defined datatype names.

-Evan

Evan K. Wallace
Manufacturing Systems Integration Division
NIST

Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2004 19:37:40 UTC