- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 23:29:16 -0600
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Time: 2100 UTC (4 PM US Eastern, 10 PM France, 8 AM Friday Eastern Australia) Number: +1-617-761-6200, passcode 9224 irc.w3.org 6665, channel #wai-wcag This weeks agenda will be focus on Ian's comments and the Conformance issues and strategies that we didn’t get to last week. 1 - Ian's posting. 2 - Should there be intermediate between 1 and 2 and 3 (Current requirements doc conformance statement says yes so if we come to different consensus we need to change requirements doc) 3 - Should definitions of how we sorted into levels 1, 2 and 3 be updated? - do we want to stick with L1 is only invisible 4 - Should checklists be normative? What are the issues? 5 - whether conformance should be based on technology status at time WCAG becomes official or whether we should lean into the future. See you Thursday. Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison <http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2004 00:30:55 UTC