- From: Luis Barriga (KI/EAB) <luis.barriga@ericsson.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 20:58:00 +0200
- To: "Thomas Roessler" <tlr@w3.org>, "Mary Ellen Zurko" <Mary_Ellen_Zurko@notesdev.ibm.com>
- Cc: <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
(Sorry for not following due to vacations) My interpretation of "no prior interaction" was related to the client state not to the user's mental state. However, current use cases don't say explicitely whether the users (Alice, Betty ... ) are using the same client (e.g. at home) or a diffent one (e.g. at work). Thus, it seems that the implicit interpretation of "prior interaction" in current scenarios is "user's mental state". Luis ________________________________ Från: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org genom Thomas Roessler Skickat: fr 2007-07-13 14:45 Till: Mary Ellen Zurko Kopia: public-wsc-wg@w3.org Ämne: Re: ISSUE-6: User Interface Issues for Mobile Browsing On 2007-07-13 08:40:18 -0400, Mary Ellen Zurko wrote: > I would very much like to extract from the thread what the set of > changes are and declare doneness. However, it makes me nervous > that no one answers questions about what "prior interaction" is > supposed to mean in our use cases. See my question: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wsc-wg/2007Jul/0067.html > > Thomas, since you set up that structure, perhaps you can respond > to that question? whooops, missed that. In fact, "prior interaction" as it stands now probably indeed confounds (a) client state and (b) user's mental state. Shouldn't be too difficult to fix that, though. -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org>
Received on Sunday, 15 July 2007 19:00:56 UTC