- From: Markku Savela <msa@msa.tte.vtt.fi>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 12:43:06 +0200 (EET)
- To: www-html@www10.w3.org
- cc: msa@msa.tte.vtt.fi
(Is this list alive even? Last message at w3c archive is from October last year..) Anyways, how did the definition of the TABLE ALIGN attribute slip by everyone into 3.2 description (Jan 97 version). 1) As defined (LEFT, RIGHT, CENTER) the defition is very much useless, because those effects can easily achieved by use of DIV (and even with <P ALIGN ..> too, because, IMHO table should never have been defined as block element, you should be able to have it inline). 2) table ALIGN attribute (and the whole table in general) is much more meaningfull, if it is interpreted the same way as the IMG. The NS treats ALIGN already this way in respect to LEFT/RIGHT (text flows around table). -- Markku Savela (msa@hemuli.tte.vtt.fi), Technical Research Centre of Finland Multimedia Systems, P.O.Box 1203,FIN-02044 VTT,http://www.vtt.fi/tte/staff/msa/
Received on Thursday, 23 January 1997 05:44:08 UTC