Re: ACTION-372 service providers and debugging from Rigo Wenning on 2013-03-26 (public-tracking@w3.org from March 2013)

From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2013 08:32:50 +0100
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: Jonathan Mayer <jmayer@stanford.edu>, David Wainberg <david@networkadvertising.org>
Message-ID: <1644765.adG1ByellU@hegel.sophia.w3.org>

Jonathan, 

On Friday 22 March 2013 17:54:21 Jonathan Mayer wrote:
> The global minimization requirement is unsettled. One textual option
> only covers retention, the other also covers collection. We also
> still have to calibrate the rigor of the global minimization
> requirement.

I don't see the dispute in the Draft. Can you give me a pointer where 
the "unsettled" comes from in your opinion?

 --Rigo

Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 07:33:14 UTC