- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:09:36 +0000
- To: David Newton <david@davidnewton.ca>
- Cc: "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 11:38 -0500, David Newton wrote: > On Mar 5, 2014, at 4:06 PM, Tobin Titus <tobint@microsoft.com> wrote: > > > plh: Didn't we agree to drop postpone and go after lazyload. > > ... I think that was what we discussed at TPAC > > JatinderMann: I think you're right. We should review TPAC notes to > > verify. > > ... I think we said we should drop postpone for now and kill the CSS > > property. > > plh: We should update the action item title to match > > JatinderMann: We should open an action item to remove postpone from > > resource priorities. > > ... That brings us up to date on TPAC. Will likely want to open more > > action items. > > <plh> https://www.w3.org/2010/webperf/track/agenda > > <plh> close issue-8 > > <trackbot> Closed issue-8. > > JatinderMann: We can likely close Issue-8 > > Are the TPAC notes available somewhere? I’m surprised by the decision > to remove `postpone` and would love to review the discussion. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2013Nov/0091.html In particular, http://www.w3.org/2013/11/14-webperf-minutes.html#item03 Philippe
Received on Friday, 7 March 2014 17:09:45 UTC