Re: [ACTION-453] Review XML Enc v1.1

Thanks Frederick,
Ed


On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 12:01 -0400, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
> Ed
> 
> Thanks for the additional comments and the update on the action.
> 
> In general, if you think an action should be closed you should  mark  
> it as pending in tracker, then it will be. You should also send a  
> message to the list noting the resolution, and including ACTION-# in  
> the message so it is linked by tracker to the action. See the  
> instructions on the group page  at http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Group/Overview.html#actions 
>    If WG members don't do this changes in status will probably be lost.
> 
> I've gone ahead and marked ACTION-453 as pending.
> 
> I've updated the editors draft with these editorial comments, apart  
> from #3, since I think this reflects the registration as it was made  
> earlier.
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 20, 2010, at 1:42 PM, ext Ed Simon wrote:
> 
> > Wasn't ACTION-453 supposed to be closed in January?
> >
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2010Jan/0084.html
> >
> > Anyway, I have the following additional comments on the latest draft  
> > (I
> > think some of my old ones still apply too):
> >
> > 1. In section 4.1, replace "will break schemas" with words along the
> > lines of "will often cause the document with encrypted parts to become
> > invalid with respect to its schema".
> >
> > 2. In 5.6.2.1's title, capitalize the 'e' in 'explicit'.
> >
> > 3. In 8.2, do we need to still mention the Macintosh file type?
> >
> > 4. In 9.1, shouldn't the example be identified as non-normative?
> >
> > This email should (really, really) close ACTION-453  ;-)
> >
> > Ed
> >
> >
> > -- 
> > ========================================
> > Ed Simon, XMLsec Inc.
> > 613-726-9645
> > edsimon@xmlsec.com
> >
> >
> 
> 
-- 
========================================
Ed Simon, XMLsec Inc.
613-726-9645
edsimon@xmlsec.com

Received on Wednesday, 21 April 2010 21:38:52 UTC