contenteditable test too loose?

Hi,

I've just published a follow-up blog post on the Web Compatibility Test,
showing the average image of the screenshots that have been submitted so
far (in fairly good quantity!):
http://www.w3.org/blog/MWITeam/2008/04/22/first_results_of_web_compatibility_test
(gallery of screenshots at http://www.w3.org/2008/04/wctmb/ )

One thing that appears in the average is a fairly broad support for the
contenteditable attribute, which I must say I find quite surprising.

I haven't had time to look at the details yet, but I'm wondering if our
test might not be too loose in detecting support for contenteditable...

Dom

Received on Tuesday, 22 April 2008 11:11:48 UTC