- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 13:51:47 +0200
- To: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Cc: WSC WG public <public-wsc-wg@w3.org>
On 20 May 2009, at 13:50, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 9 May 2009, at 11:48, Thomas Roessler wrote: > >> Looking at Yngve's message here: >> >> http://www.w3.org/mid/op.us37ivemvqd7e2@killashandra.oslo.opera.com >> >> ... I wonder what the next step is. I think we have the following >> open points: >> >> 1. We need to add a MAY clause after the first paragraph of 5.4.1: >> >>> When TLS error conditions occur, user agents MAY choose to abort >>> the connection without any further user interaction. The >>> guidelines in this section apply when user agents choose to cause >>> a user interaction in the case of TLS error conditions. >> >> >> 2. We might want to make it more clear above that a user agent can >> very well both follow the detailed guidance in 5.4.1 (e.g., for the >> top-level frame), and choose to do the hard abort in some cases -- >> e.g., XMLHttpRequest, and that the latter is indeed the recommended >> course of action. > > Per ACTION-574, I propose to add the following text after the MAY > clause given above: For tracker's benefit, that was ACTION-594, not ACTION-574. >> Note that user agents may combine both practices: E.g., an >> interactive approach may be chosen for the top-level frame of a Web >> page, but a non-interactive approach may be chosen for inline >> content. It is expected that the XMLHttpRequest specification will >> include a non-interactive approach as well. > > Thoughts? >
Received on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 11:51:57 UTC