RE: ISSUE-92: P3P and Internet filters

I find this proposed text confusing since the Note doesn't suggest any
standards or recommend building or extending anything. That's what the
Rec document will do.
 
The text of the original issue asks that we make a recommendation that
uses P3P technology and is compatible with "currently used Internet
filters". That sounds like someone wants to make a recommendation
proposal. That's fine, but I don't think the Note should be requiring
the existence of such a proposal. Perhaps ISSUE-92 should be turned into
an action item for the author to make a recommendation proposal. Either
way, I don't think any edits to the Note are warranted.
 
Tyler

________________________________

From: public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wsc-wg-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Mary Ellen Zurko
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 12:24 PM
To: public-wsc-wg@w3.org
Subject: ISSUE-92: P3P and Internet filters



The current proposal is to add the following paragraph to what is
currently the end of 
the overview: 

The suggested standards in this document are intended to be consisent
with the
standards and best practices coming out of the work of other efforts,
such
as P3P, WAI and other efforts. In those cases were we recommend building
and extending some of this work, as in the case of Safe Web Browsing and
filtering, it is noted in the recommendation.

There seems to be concensus on this one. Tyler, please make the change
and close the issue.