Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.

Group call on Sep 25, 2013

From Emergency Information Community Group
Jump to: navigation, search

Minutes of call on September 25, 2013

Participants:

  • Eva Blomqvist - Linköping Uni & CNR
  • Joseph Pollack - IOS@ERCIS, Münster DE
  • Thomas Vandieken - Fraunhofer IAO, Stuttgart GER
  • Hemant Purohit - Kno.e.sis Center, US
  • Renato Iannella - Semantic Identity, AU
  • Carsten Kessler – Hunter College – CUNY, NYC
  • Bart van Leeuwen - netage.nl ( 2nd hat Profesional Fire Fighter Amsterdam-Amstelland )
  • Tomi Kauppinen – Aalto University, Finland
  • Mark Prutsalis - Sahana Software Foundation, US

Agenda:

Formalities

  • transcribing telcons in Google doc(s), copy over to group wiki after call
  • Queuing Q/A
  • Use chat to interrupt

How to get organizations on board?

  • practitioners often don’t know what they want/need
  • often don’t see that they have an interoperability problem, more interested in end products
  • Bart will try to get some people from the Dutch community on board: bart, bert & Ilse ?
  • Carsten: UN OCHA
  • Other practitioner contacts to involve (each person tries to use their contacts):
    • Eva: companies in Sweden: VSL AB (crisis training company, also develops training software), and Saab (large software dev. company who does a lot in security and crisis management, e.g. this), I will also contact MSB (who has a current project on national crisis coordination in Sweden)
    • Joseph will leverage his contacts from France, Norway, and NL

What phases of the emergency do we focus on?

  • Thomas: Several approaches exist to define a scope e.g. differentiate phases (relief, early recovery, reconstruction), focus on activities, specific decision makers or generic challenges like information fusion/integration, or how to judge the quality of an information from an external source?
  • Bart: involve actors to learn where their information exchange problems are -> let this guide our focus
  • Joseph: Collect such data that we already have from the group participants’ previous work.
  • Bart: switch from a general fire to a disaster is difficult and nor clear, “grey area”; requires switch of tools, standards, etc.
  • Think of general, small-scale incidents as special cases of large-scale disaster
  • Joseph: review reports? -> political flavor, watered down
  • Look for and share review papers of such reports
  • Hemant: Focus on response phase?
  • Bart: Look up work on existing standards, overlaps, conflicts, missing pieces; problems in day to day work are mostly based on inconsistent terminology
  • Tomi: Look at existing datasets; Joseph: simulations? Datasets not so useful without the actual communication, which is often not included
  • Carsten: when reviewing datasets, talk to the people who created them to figure out where the problems are

Brainstorm about existing standards (both SemWeb-based and other relevant to the field)

Brainstorm about use cases

Options for face to face meetings

Abstract for UNISDR 2015 Global Assessment Report

Action items

  • Carsten: share this doc, send schedule for next calls
  • All: talk to their local contacts (companies, other organizations) about joining the group