Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
Group call on Sep 25, 2013
From Emergency Information Community Group
Contents
- 1 Minutes of call on September 25, 2013
- 1.1 Participants:
- 1.2 Agenda:
- 1.2.1 Formalities
- 1.2.2 How to get organizations on board?
- 1.2.3 What phases of the emergency do we focus on?
- 1.2.4 Brainstorm about existing standards (both SemWeb-based and other relevant to the field)
- 1.2.5 Brainstorm about use cases
- 1.2.6 Options for face to face meetings
- 1.2.7 Abstract for UNISDR 2015 Global Assessment Report
- 1.2.8 Action items
Minutes of call on September 25, 2013
Participants:
- Eva Blomqvist - Linköping Uni & CNR
- Joseph Pollack - IOS@ERCIS, Münster DE
- Thomas Vandieken - Fraunhofer IAO, Stuttgart GER
- Hemant Purohit - Kno.e.sis Center, US
- Renato Iannella - Semantic Identity, AU
- Carsten Kessler – Hunter College – CUNY, NYC
- Bart van Leeuwen - netage.nl ( 2nd hat Profesional Fire Fighter Amsterdam-Amstelland )
- Tomi Kauppinen – Aalto University, Finland
- Mark Prutsalis - Sahana Software Foundation, US
Agenda:
Formalities
- transcribing telcons in Google doc(s), copy over to group wiki after call
- Queuing Q/A
- Use chat to interrupt
How to get organizations on board?
- practitioners often don’t know what they want/need
- often don’t see that they have an interoperability problem, more interested in end products
- Bart will try to get some people from the Dutch community on board: bart, bert & Ilse ?
- Carsten: UN OCHA
- Other practitioner contacts to involve (each person tries to use their contacts):
- Eva: companies in Sweden: VSL AB (crisis training company, also develops training software), and Saab (large software dev. company who does a lot in security and crisis management, e.g. this), I will also contact MSB (who has a current project on national crisis coordination in Sweden)
- Joseph will leverage his contacts from France, Norway, and NL
What phases of the emergency do we focus on?
- Thomas: Several approaches exist to define a scope e.g. differentiate phases (relief, early recovery, reconstruction), focus on activities, specific decision makers or generic challenges like information fusion/integration, or how to judge the quality of an information from an external source?
- Bart: involve actors to learn where their information exchange problems are -> let this guide our focus
- Joseph: Collect such data that we already have from the group participants’ previous work.
- Bart: switch from a general fire to a disaster is difficult and nor clear, “grey area”; requires switch of tools, standards, etc.
- Think of general, small-scale incidents as special cases of large-scale disaster
- Joseph: review reports? -> political flavor, watered down
- Look for and share review papers of such reports
- Hemant: Focus on response phase?
- Bart: Look up work on existing standards, overlaps, conflicts, missing pieces; problems in day to day work are mostly based on inconsistent terminology
- Tomi: Look at existing datasets; Joseph: simulations? Datasets not so useful without the actual communication, which is often not included
- Carsten: when reviewing datasets, talk to the people who created them to figure out where the problems are
Brainstorm about existing standards (both SemWeb-based and other relevant to the field)
- Existing standards:
- IEEE 802.11n
- OASIS-CAP (Common Alerting Protocol)
- OASIS-UIMA (Unstructured Information Management Architecture)
- WSDL and SOAP
- W3C EIIF Review: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/eiif/wiki/EMInfoStdsReview
- EDXL – Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) v1.1, an International Telecommunications Union (ITU) Recommendation x.1303 in 2007
- Emergency Data eXchange Language (EDXL) – Distribution Element (DE) (2006)
- EDXL – Resource Messaging (RM) (2009)
- EDXL – Hospital Availability (HAVE) (2009)
- EDXL – Situation Reporting (SitRep) work in progress
- EDXL – Tracking of Emergency Patients (TEP), analysis phase
- EDXL – Tracking of Emergency Clients (TEC), analysis phase
- The CAP v1.2 Integrated Public Alert and Warning System (IPAWS) Profile v1.0 was approved as a Committee Specification in 2009. The Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency **Management Agency (FEMA) has decided to adopt an alerting protocol in line with CAP 1.1 as the standard for Public Alerts and Warning.
- HXL - Humanitarian Exchange Language
- Protection & Rescue Markup-Language (http://www.spider-federation.org/en/prml.html)
- Management of a Crisis (http://observedchange.com/moac/ns/)
- AMIGO http://www.hitech-projects.com/euprojects/amigo/index.htm, SOCRADES http://www.socrades.eu/Project/Presentation/default.html , SODIUM and HYDRA http://www.hydramiddleware.eu
- AiDA XML (http://web.archive.org/web/20070724140917/home.bellanet.org/aida/schema_explained.htm)
- CEFDA (Common Exchange Format for Development Activity information) (http://idmlinitiative.org/?page_id=87)
- IATI Standard (http://iatistandard.org/)
- http://www.firebrary.com Initiative to create a SKOS-XL representation of firedepartment related terminology based on the idea of: http://skybrary.areo ( Bart van Leeuwen )
- Discussion doc from CrisisMappers community members to build R&D around identifying actionable info, extracting and organizing it-- useful here for modeling specific actionable information too
- Advances to the Standards:
- Logistics?
- Emergency Management simple terminology?
- Social Media Inputs?
- simple vocabularies ?
Brainstorm about use cases
Options for face to face meetings
- ICCM 2013 in Nairobi
- Organize a workshop at ISCRAM 2014
- Visual Analytics track at ISCRAM 2014
- http://iscram2014.ist.psu.edu/node/31
- Virtual seminar
Abstract for UNISDR 2015 Global Assessment Report
Action items
- Carsten: share this doc, send schedule for next calls
- All: talk to their local contacts (companies, other organizations) about joining the group