W3C User Agent Telecon for May 23rd, 2002

Chair: Jon Gunderson
Date: Thursday, 23 May 2002
Time: 2:00-3:30 pm Boston Local Time, USA (18:00-19:30 UTC/GMT)
Call-in: Longfellow Bridge (+1) (617) 252-1038

Agenda

Review Action Items

Announcements

none

Discussion

1. Access forum meeting in Washington on 3 June 2002
   http://www.accessibilityforum.org/meetings/june2002/announcement.html
2. Issue 529: 6.1, 6.2: Is DOM required at P1, or some API?
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#529
   • Proposed modified checkpoints in Guideline 6: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0093.html
   • Comment on DOM binding requirement: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0103.html
   • Overview issues: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2002/04/api-summary
3. Issue 528: 6.2, 6.3: Security issues in some cases for write access to content. How to handle exceptions?
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#528
4. Issue 532: 6.9 (timely access): What "exchanges" does this checkpoint refer to?
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#532
5. Issue 531: 3.4 (Toggle scripts): Most pages will include scripts, so alert requirement will be so frequent as to not be useful
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#531
6. Issue 530: 2.2: Definition of, determination of "xml and sgml applications" unclear. Rely on internet media types?
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#530

Attendance

Chair: Jon Gunderson

Scribe: Ian Jacobs

Present:
Rich Schwerdtfeger
Marissa Demeglio
Jim Allan
Tim Lacy
David Poehlman
Aaron Leventhal

Regrets:
Harvey Bingham
Eric Hansen

Action Item Summary

Open Action Items

1. IJ: Review UAAG 1.0 for which checkpoints should be "all formats" v. "formats that are part of the claim".
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0049.html
2. JG: Write up user scenarios for why non-text-based highlighting important for users; notably which users.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
   See for additional questions: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0029.html
3. JG: Clarify why "Max rating" used in some cases (in low implementation experience section) and "Avg rating" in some cases. Also, delete "+/-" with P (round down from G to P)
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0049.html

New Action Items

none

Completed Action Items

1. IJ: Send proposal for Guideline 10 modifications based on today's teleconference
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
2. IJ: Propose text to the UAWG on conformance profiles for use by other specifcations.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
3. JG: Contact developers for API requirements
   Done

Minutes