WAI UA Telecon for May 9th, 2002

Chair: Jon Gunderson
Date: Thursday, 9 May 2002
Time: 2:00-3:30 pm Boston Local Time, USA (18:00-19:30 UTC/GMT)
Call-in: Longfellow Bridge (+1) (617) 252-1038

Agenda

Review Action Items

Announcements

none

Discussion

1. Issue 544: Should we delete requirements re: fee links from UAAG 1.0 since not really part of Web today?
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#544
2. Issue 543: [Clarification] 11.5: Forward/back one viewport for 2d renderings only?
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#543
3. Issue 542: [Clarification] 11.5: What does "refresh" mean, notably in light of usage in 3.5
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#542
4. Issue 541: [Clarification] 11.5 (default binding requirements): Moving UI focus to address box sufficient
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#541
5. Issue 540: [Editorial] 10.3 (indicate rendering progress): Clarify that not about download progress, but position of viewport
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#540
6. Issue 539: 11.6 (user profiles): Must the user profile be portable? Does saving configurations suffice?
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#539
7. Issue 538: [Editorial] Make checkpoint requirements distinct from exceptions, sufficient conditions
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#538
8. Issue 536: [Editorial] 9.7: Title is too forceful and doesn't communicate key bit of checkpoint
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#536
9. Issue 535: 9.4 (restore history): Must consider UA cache availability Issue
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#535
10. 534: [Clarification] 9.3 (Move content focus): Clarify that "each element" refers to elements in set defined in provision 1
    http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html#534

Attendance

Chair: Jon Gunderson

Scribe: Ian Jacobs

Present:
David Poehlman
Eric Hansen
Tim Lacy
Harvey Bingham
Jim Allan

Regrets:

Action Item Summary

Open Action Items

1. IJ: Send proposal for Guideline 10 modifications based on today's teleconference
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
2. IJ: Propose text to the UAWG on conformance profiles for use by other specifcations.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
3. IJ: Review UAAG 1.0 for which checkpoints should be "all formats" v. "formats that are part of the claim".
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0049.html
4. JG: Write up user scenarios for why non-text-based highlighting important for users; notably which users.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
   See for additional questions: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0029.html
5. JG: Clarify why "Max rating" used in some cases (in low implementation experience section) and "Avg rating" in some cases. Also, delete "+/-" with P (round down from G to P)
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0049.html
6. JG: Contact developers for API requirements
7. ALL: Send to the WG the top 5 things you need through an API.
   Deadline: 4 April 2002

New Action Items

None

Completed Action Items

1. IJ: Update issues list.
2. RS: Write up paragraph about the importance of thread-safe access for in-process ATs.
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002JanMar/0100.html
3. IJ: Add a note to 12.2 (documentation) to remind people that APIs benefit accessibility.
4. IJ: Update techniques document with RS text:
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0055
5. HB: Find out what SVG WG is doing these days in the way of test suites, and find out how to get UAAG 1.0 requirements incorporated.
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0049.html

Minutes