W3C logo Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) logo

WAI UA Telecon for April 11th, 2002


Chair: Jon Gunderson
Date: Thursday, 11 April 2002
Time: 2:00-3:30 pm Boston Local Time, USA (18:00-19:30 UTC/GMT)
Call-in: Longfellow Bridge (+1) (617) 252-1038


Agenda

Review Action Items

Announcements

  1. Next meeting 18 April

Discussion

  1. Implementation Report Update
    http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/implementation/report-cr2.html
  2. Test Suites
    http://cita.rehab.uiuc.edu/courses/2002-01-LIS350AR/project/html/index.html
  3. AT Survey
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0032.html
  4. Issues
    http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html

Attendance

Chair: Jon Gunderson

Scribe: Ian Jacobs

Present:
Jost Eckhardt
Tim Lacy
Harvey Bingham

Regrets:
David Poehlman
Jim Allan
Jill Thomas


Action Item Summary

Open Action Items

  1. IJ: Send proposal for Guideline 10 modifications based on today's teleconference
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
  2. IJ: Propose text to the UAWG on conformance profiles for use by other specifcations.
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
  3. JG: Write up user scenarios for why non-text-based highlighting important for users; notably which users.
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
    See for additional questions: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0029.html
  4. RS: Write up paragraph about the importance of thread-safe access for in-process ATs.
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002JanMar/0100.html
  5. ALL: Send to the WG the top 5 things you need through an API.
    Deadline: 4 April 2002

New Action Items

  1. JG: Clarify why "Max rating" used in some cases (in low implementation experience section) and "Avg rating" in some cases. Also, delete "+/-" with P (round down from G to P)
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0049.html
  2. HB: Find out what SVG WG is doing these days in the way of test suites, and find out how to get UAAG 1.0 requirements incorporated.
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0049.html
  3. IJ: Review UAAG 1.0 for which checkpoints should be "all formats" v. "formats that are part of the claim".
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0049.html

Completed Action Items

  1. IJ: Add issue - should we delete fee link requirements in UAAG 1.0 since not part of today's Web?
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
  2. IJ: Ask what the importance of in-process communication of the DOM to Rich and Aaron on the list. Should it be part of the requirement or be considered an implementation detail in certain environments?
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
  3. IJ: Add question to the issues list: Are there some requirements that must be satisfied for *all formats* corresponding to a given content type label, even when a claim is for fewer than all implemented formats corresponding to that label?
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html

Minutes


Copyright  ©  2002 W3C (MIT, INRIA, Keio ), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document use and software licensing rules apply. Your interactions with this site are in accordance with our public and Member privacy statements.