WAI UA Telecon for April 11th, 2002

Chair: Jon Gunderson
Date: Thursday, 11 April 2002
Time: 2:00-3:30 pm Boston Local Time, USA (18:00-19:30 UTC/GMT)
Call-in: Longfellow Bridge (+1) (617) 252-1038

Agenda

Review Action Items

Announcements

1. Next meeting 18 April

Discussion

1. Implementation Report Update
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/implementation/report-cr2.html
2. Test Suites
   http://cita.rehab.uiuc.edu/courses/2002-01-LIS350AR/project/html/index.html
3. AT Survey
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0032.html
4. Issues
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/issues/issues-linear-cr2.html

Attendance

Chair: Jon Gunderson

Scribe: Ian Jacobs

Present:
Jost Eckhardt
Tim Lacy
Harvey Bingham

Regrets:
David Poehlman
Jim Allan
Jill Thomas

Action Item Summary

Open Action Items

1. IJ: Send proposal for Guideline 10 modifications based on today's teleconference
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
2. IJ: Propose text to the UAWG on conformance profiles for use by other specifcations.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
3. JG: Write up user scenarios for why non-text-based highlighting important for users; notably which users.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
   See for additional questions: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0029.html
4. RS: Write up paragraph about the importance of thread-safe access for in-process ATs.
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002JanMar/0100.html
5. ALL: Send to the WG the top 5 things you need through an API.
   Deadline: 4 April 2002

New Action Items

1. JG: Clarify why "Max rating" used in some cases (in low implementation experience section) and "Avg rating" in some cases. Also, delete "+/-" with P (round down from G to P)
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0049.html
2. HB: Find out what SVG WG is doing these days in the way of test suites, and find out how to get UAAG 1.0 requirements incorporated.
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0049.html
3. IJ: Review UAAG 1.0 for which checkpoints should be "all formats" v. "formats that are part of the claim".
   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0049.html

Completed Action Items

1. IJ: Add issue - should we delete fee link requirements in UAAG 1.0 since not part of today's Web?
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
2. IJ: Ask what the importance of in-process communication of the DOM to Rich and Aaron on the list. Should it be part of the requirement or be considered an implementation detail in certain environments?
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html
3. IJ: Add question to the issues list: Are there some requirements that must be satisfied for *all formats* corresponding to a given content type label, even when a claim is for fewer than all implemented formats corresponding to that label?
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2002AprJun/0027.html

Minutes