W3C logo Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) logo

WAI UA Telecon for March 8th, 2001

Chair: Jon Gunderson
Date: Thursday, 8 March 2001
Time: 2:00-4:00 pm Eastern Standard Time, USA
Call-in: Longfellow Bridge (+1) (617) 252-1038

Agenda

Review Action Items

Announcements

None

Discussion

  1. Issue 464: Applicability clause needs review since "role" not always known from format (e.g., captions in SMIL)
    http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#464
  2. Issue 463: Create section on how to refer to UAAG from other specifications
    http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#463
  3. Issue 462: Merging checkpoints related to automatic refresh (3.5) and redirection (3.6)
    http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#462
  4. Issue 449: Create an executive summary for UAAG 1.0
    http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#449
  5. Issue 430: Checkpoint 3.2: Animations, not just animated images
    http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#430
  6. Proposal to change wording of checkpoints that refer to "current viewport"
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0324.html
  7. Review of new checkpoints for the accessibility of elements with event handlers
    http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
  8. Review of new checkpoints for speech adjustability
    http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes

Attendance

Chair: Jon Gunderson

Scribe: Ian Jacobs

Present:Harvey Bingham,
David Poehlman
Mickey Quenzer
Tim Lacy
Jim Allan
Charles McCathieNevile
Gregory Rosmaita
Eric Hansen,
Rich Schwerdtfeger

Regrets:
none

Action Item Summary

Open Action Items

  1. IJ: Coordinate usability testing of the guidelines (JRG volunteers to be one of the testers).
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0137.html
  2. IJ: Write an executive summary appendix.
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0200.html
  3. IJ: Propose text for how other documents should reference UAAG 1.0
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
  4. IJ: Distinguish techniques for fast forward versus faster palying (digital talking books), and point to digital talking books
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
  5. IJ: Add a Note to checkpoint 4.4.pointing to applicability provision about streaming and whether slow/etc.control enabled by the format.
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
  6. JG: Propose text for the techniques document about synthesized speech implementation issues. Notably UA and AT wanting to use the same synthesizer engine.
  7. JG: Create issue list for things that need to be addressed in the next version of the document
  8. JG: Write a proposal related to the expected actions as the result of triggering events associated with the focused element.
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
  9. JG: Take to WAI PF the requirement that formats need to provide a more precise means for specifying events (than HTML allows for).
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
  10. JG: Create a wish list of other requirements not in UAAG 1.0, including those that might fall under this Guideline.
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
  11. JG: Write up some techniques for checkpoints on scripts on/off about subsetting the configuration.
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
  12. JG: Take to the WAI CG the question ofpursuing the DOM Views and Formatting module.
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
  13. JG: Call Cindy King about formats that support separate windows for captioning information
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
  14. GL and TL: Ask someone from Microsoft whether they will evaluate the guidelines with a product.
    Deadline: 2/1/2001
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0137.html
  15. TL: Report to WG on discussions at Microsoft about keyboard emulation.
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0227.html
  16. RS: Send pointer to information about universal access gateway to the WG.
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0258.html

New Action Items

  1. CMN: Find out from SYMM WG whether repositioning of objects will appear in the spec (or should be in UAAG).
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0357.html
  2. IJ: Take to the cross-WG WAI list the issue of how to refer to UAAG (or other WAI specs) in non-W3C documents
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0357.html

Completed Action Items

  1. CMN: Propose an algorithm to the generate a window containing caption information to UAWG and to ERT based on combining different separate sources of video and captioning information using SMIL and XSLT.
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
    Completed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0305.html
  2. CMN: Propose a definition of animation.I think it does overlap with video and animated images. Provide a definitionthat makes clear why "animated images" are not explicitly mentioned in 4.4 andwhy video and animated images are both in 3.2
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
    Completed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0306.html
  3. IJ: Find clearer wording for the phrase "optional content" especially when used in the phrase "required optional content".
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0258.html.
    Completed in 24 Feb 2001 draft.
  4. IJ: Put back rationale about why user control of optional content is required (to allow users to find useful equivalents)
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0258.html.
    Done in 24 Feb 2001 Draft
  5. IJ: Update document based resolution of the "definition issues" proposal
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0258.html
    Proposed:
    Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0258.html
    Done in 24 Feb 2001 Draft
  6. IJ: Add clarify note to checkpoint 7.5 (searching)
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
  7. IJ: Craft a demo guideline to convey the message of user control over the UI.
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
    Done, refer to proposed guidelines split
  8. IJ: Add technnique to checkpoint 8.9 (fee links)
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes.
    Done, will appear in next draft.
  9. GR: Talk to National Tech Center at AFB about possible information on importance of documentation to users withdisabilities.
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
    Completed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0353.html
  10. RS: Write to w3c-wai-ua asking whether,within IE, it's possible to simulate mouse button events in a way that wouldgenerate an appropriate event object. Can we get the box from IE.
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
    Completed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0301.html
  11. HB: Talk to Geoff Freed (WGBH) about formats that support separate windows for captioning information
    Source: http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/03/ua-minutes
    Completed: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0359.html
  12. GR: Review checkpoints in Guideline 10 for implementation information
    Dropped
  13. JA: Review checkpoints in Guideline 4 for implementation information
    Dropped
  14. JG: Implementation information for guideline 2
    Dropped

Link to Minutes

Copyright  ©  2001 W3C (MIT, INRIA, Keio ), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document use and software licensing rules apply. Your interactions with this site are in accordance with our public and Member privacy statements.