WAI UA Telecon for February 15th, 2001

Chair: Jon Gunderson
Date: Thursday, 15 Febraury 2001
Time: 2:00-4:00 pm Eastern Standard Time, USA
Call-in: Longfellow Bridge (+1) (617) 252-1038

Agenda

Review Action Items

Announcements

1. Register for User Agent face-to-face meeting in Boston on 1-2 March 2001

Discussion

1. Coordination of joint meetings with DOM and CSS
2. Issue 443: Checkpoint 1.4: Device indepdent access to pointer (mouse) specific events.
   Source: http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc2.html#443
   Status: The document currently requires emulation of mouse-specific controls by virtue of our requirement that the user must be able to do everything through the mouse.
   Discussion:
   a) Do we want to require the UA to repair device-specific bindings specified by the author?
   b) Do we have evidence that the ability to simulate mouse events through the keyboard benefits the user?
3. Definition Issues:
   1. Issue 359: Definition: text content (incompatible with WCAG?)
   2. Issue 358: Definition: Equivalent
   3. Issue 322: The definition of the word element
   4. Issue 321: Equivalency relationships and the wording of checkpoint 2.3
   5. Issue 394: Checkpoint 2.1: Vague about what cannot be provided through a source view

Attendance

Chair: Jon Gunderson

Scribe: Ian Jacobs

Present:
David Poehlman
Harvey Bingham
Mickey Quenzer
Gregory Rosmaita
Tim Lacy

Regrets:
Denis Anson
Eric Hansen
Jim Allan

Action Item Summary

Open Action Items

1. IJ, EH, AG: Propose new definitions forterms in question (equivalence, text element, etc.)
2. IJ: Coordinate usability testing of the guidelines (JRG volunteers to be one of the testers).
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0137.html
3. IJ: Write an executive summary appendix.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0200.html
4. JG: Implementation information for guideline 2
5. JG: Propose text for the techniques document about synthesized speech implementation issues. Notably UA and AT wanting to use the same synthesizer engine.
6. JG: Create issue list for things that need to be addressed in the next version of the document
7. GL: Ask someone from Microsoft whether they will evaluate the guidelines with a product.
   Deadline: 2/1/2001
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0137.html
8. GR: Review checkpoints in Guideline 10 for implementation information
9. JA: Review checkpoints in Guideline 4 for implementation information

New Action Items

1. IJ: Send an email about CSS issues to take to the CSS WG. Confirm that IJ will attend CSS meeting earlier in the week to discuss WAI issues.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0227.html
2. IJ: Write a proposal trying to define repair requirements for pointing device specific event handlers we might include in the guidelines.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0227.html
3. TL: Report to WG on discussions at Microsoft about keyboard emulation.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0227.html

Completed Action Items

1. IJ: Send email to list asking for input on scope of checkpoint 1.1 including emulation of device specific behaviors
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0193.html
   Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0203.html
2. JG: Talk to Al Gilman at the next WAI CG meeting about a joint meeting with UA, PF, and Voice WG (or participants) to discuss accessibility issues.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0083.html
   Done
3. JG: Ping AOL to see if they can attend
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0193.html
   Done
4. JG: Ask WAI PF/WAI ER/WAI CG about their experience with repair of device-specific event handlers and indicate that we are leaning towards lowering the priority of repair here.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0200.html
   Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0203.html
5. JG: Send an outline of what should be in a executive summary.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0200.html
   Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0220.html
6. EH: Send thoughts on what should be in a executive summary.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0200.html
   Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0221.html
7. RS: Find out what HPR's intentions are re: repair of device-specific event handlers.
   Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0200.html
   Done: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JanMar/0226.html
8. KB: Submit technique on providing information on current item and number of items in search
   Cancelled

Link to Minutes