Flipchart Transcript of Silver Presentation at TPAC 2016 (20 September 2016)

These are the notes from the reports of the individual groups discussing the Silver options. Each group was composed of people from differing viewpoints about the options they wanted. It was expected that the flipchart issues would be used for discussion, but there was consensus in the group for the More Flexible option, so the projected discussion didn't happen.

How much time spent?
If urgent, do it quickly
Better quality from more people
Rapid iteration
Living standard approach -- more adaptive
Better accessiiblity for emerging technology
Support INNOVATION!
Support policymakers & Regulators
Stakeholder include how the user agent supporting the user
Regulartory System are vairied -- take advantage of uptake models and maximum flexibility. Threshold constraints.
More emphasis on desig to solve the longer problems that exist
Like #3, #1 might be too much
#3 and add gap analysis
inlcude more priorities and concerns between the research and the prototype phases. Double Diamond approach, there needs to be a report summarizing the Research phase before moving into the Prototype phase.
Concern for funding
include broad stakeholders
Quality is more important than speed, but we need firm, credible milestones
Designing the guidelines oculd be never-ending, so a timeline is essential
Thinking 5-7 years to get to REC
TImeline needs more flexibility
Once we set a timeline, we stick to it
Need time for experientation
Do the prototyping before entering the W3C Process
use editor draft space for experimentation
Research phase is the most predictable for timeline
Continuity of institutional memory of WCAG 1.0, 2.0, 2.1 -- there should not be a "jarring" difference from 2.1
Should stay in WCAG WG
Needs to be a dynamic handof from 2.x to 3.0
Expland the pool of people
Transition is key!