See also: IRC log
<scribe> scribe: David
Resolution: close 739 with Ben's edits
<scribe> ACTION: Gez to write a no-ebed technique demonstration [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/02-wai-wcag-irc]
Resolution: Accept 786 as revised
Resolution: accept 975 as revised
resolution: accept 1160 as amended
... send 1201 back to team C
resolution: split 1329 into 2 issues, close 1.3.6 issue, break out issue on 1.3.1 and leave it open ,
Resolution: leave 964 open
resolution: accept issue 695 as proposed removing the recommedation for the use of quotations marks.
... close 698 with a message pointing out that there is already a failure for this situation.
... Accept proposed Font Scaling resolution from f2f
... Accept font scaling language: if we can find proper wording, there should be at least one SC dealing with font scaling
If we can find proper wording, there should be a SC at least at Level 3 that deals with scaling and reflow (font and other?)
If we can find proper wording, there should be a SC at least at Level 3 that deals with scaling and reflow (font and other?)
Resolution: If it's a SC it must be testable.
... Accept f2f "Everything at L1 or L2 can be applied to all web content."
<scribe> ACTION: Gregg to explore recasting photosensitive issue into angle of view. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/11/02-wai-wcag-irc]
Resolution: acept f2f "SC 1.3.4 should be folded into SC 1.3.1, with text descriptions provided as a fallback technique when a technology does not provide a mechanism to describe a relationship."
... Proceed with developing a hybrid approach to the "baseline" concept that includes rules for using technologies and sufficient techniques for conformance.
accept F2F Proposed consensus on Guideline 4.2 issues:
Move handling of alternate versions from 4.2.1 and 4.2.3 to conformance (there is a logic flaw by keeping 4.2.1 and 4.2.3 in as success criteria; content that is suppose to pass 4.2.1 and 4.2.3 would fail all or some of the other success criteria)
keep 4.2.2 and 4.2.4 as success criteria
Resolution: Accept F2F Proposed consensus on Guideline 4.2 issues:
Move handling of alternate versions from 4.2.1 and 4.2.3 to conformance (there is a logic flaw by keeping 4.2.1 and 4.2.3 in as success criteria; content that is suppose to pass 4.2.1 and 4.2.3 would fail all or some of the other success criteria)
keep 4.2.2 and 4.2.4 as success criteria
Resolution: Accept F2F
Proposed consensus on Level AAA issues:
AAA conformance means all applicable level 3 success criteria are met
Those making conformance claims can report progress towards higher level if they specify particular success criteria they have met.
No A+ or AA+ claim languages, only A or AA etc.