See also: IRC log
<scribe> scribe: David
resolution: close unanimously accepted items except pure editorial, 467,474,475, 491, 535, 536, 537, 538, 539,570
resolution: accept proposed resolution with edits from Gregg and Christophe
Resolution: refer 562 back down to the group for specific wording, it is substantive, we'll put a hold on it, until all the comments come in because it will be related to other comments
resolution: 563 referred back for further consideration
Resolution: LC-464 sent back down for comments to be incorporated and considered
<scribe> ACTION: Gregg check with Ben to incorporate C6 idea for LC-469 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/05/25-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action01]
resolution: LC-469 put on hold because more comments will likely come in.
resolution: unanimously accepted proposed resolution for 529
<Zakim> Michael, you wanted to say I can live without it, but think people won't understand baselines without meaningful examples
Resolution: keep LC-531 open, hold for more comments
<scribe> ACTION: Gregg, David, Loretta, Bruce Bailey work on examples of Baselines [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/05/25-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action02]
<rellero> sorry, cannot call, problems with skype
<Zakim> wendy, you wanted to say "issue of how to measure level 3 is a different issue from whether 3 exists" and to say "features at risk - could be part of CR"
<wendy> 12 (13 with bruce)
Resolution: put 533 on hold,
<scribe> ACTION: David, Michael, Bruce, Loretta, Cynthia to look at alternate formations for level 3 conformance due close of comments [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/05/25-wai-wcag-minutes.html#action03]
Resolution: 534 sent back for exact wording
... LC-539 put on hold because it deals wth level 3 conformance
<wendy> brb
Resolution: put LC 564 on hold
topc: LC-565
resolution: close 476 with edits by Andi and approval by editors