There are no objections.
| # | Author | Summary and discussion | Result | 
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Florian Rivoal | Add 'background-position-x' and 'background-position-y'  | Rejected and verified | 
| 2. | David Baron | Computed value line for 'background-repeat' is imprecise  | Accepted | 
| 3 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Reorder the border-*-radius definitions in the spec  | Accepted | 
| 4 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | “Applies to” for 'border-radius' doesn't match prose  | Accepted | 
| 5 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Negative values for 'border-radius' should explicitly be illegal  | Accepted | 
| 6 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Rephrase note about inner curve in 5.2  | Accepted | 
| 7 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Unclear text about corner transitions in 5.4  | Accepted | 
| 8 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Insert “two corresponding” in the formula in 5.5  | Accepted | 
| 9 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Remove redundant paragraph “The rendering must be exactly…” in 5.5  | Accepted | 
| 10 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Example 24 should have only images A and B, D and C are the same  | Accepted | 
| 11 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Example 25 belongs in 5.1 instead of 5.6  | Accepted | 
| 12 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Use “{1,2}” instead of “?” in syntax of 'border-radius'  | Accepted | 
| 13 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Initial value of 'border-radius' should be “see individual properties”  | Accepted | 
| 14 | Christoph Päper | Also allow to specify corners with an <angle> instead of two <length>  | Rejected and verified | 
| 15 | Christoph Päper | Add a “cut” corner style (border-corner-shape: normal|curved|sharp)  | Rejected and verified | 
| 16 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | 'Border-image' syntax allows odd trailing slash. Syntax should disallow it. And maybe also disallow two slashes in a row.  | Accepted | 
| 17 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | 'background' shorthand specification text fails to say that 'background-image' is reset.  | Accepted | 
| 18 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | The specification should say which background and border properties apply to first-line and first-letter.  | Accepted | 
| 19 | Fantasai (WG member) | What is the background of the page area? 
  | Out of scope and verified | 
| 20 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Rewording and more verbose grammar (or an informative note) for 'background-position'  | Accepted | 
| 21 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Unclear what border style is used on table cells, when 'border-image-source' doesn't apply  | Accepted | 
| 22 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Clarify how border-image applies to table elements with collapsing borders (relation to border conflict resolution)  | Accepted | 
| 23 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Ambiguous phrasing about 'inset' and tables  | Accepted | 
| 24 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | Line thickness in 4.3 uses ambiguous words “may not” (“may not be negative”). Should say: “are not allowed.”  | Accepted | 
| 25 | Lev Solntsev | Allow colors (esp. semi-transparent ones) on all background layers.  | Rejected but unverified | 
| 26 | Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu | What is the “boundary” of a table cell?  | Accepted | 
Legend:
| Status | Meaning | 
|---|---|
| Retracted | Commenter has withdrawn the comment. | 
| Accepted | The WG accepted and applied the comment. | 
| Out of scope and verified | Commenter accepts that the comment is out of scope. | 
| Invalid and verified | Commenter accepts that the comment is invalid. | 
| Rejected and verified | Commenter accepts that the WG did not apply the comment. | 
| Out of scope but unverified | Comment out of scope, but commenter did not yet react. | 
| Invalid but unverified | Comment invalid, but commenter did not yet react. | 
| Rejected but unverified | Comment rejected, but commenter did not yet react. | 
| Out of scope with objection | Comment out of scope, but commenter disagrees. | 
| Invalid with objection | Comment invalid, but commenter disagrees. | 
| Rejected with objection | Comment rejected, but commenter objects. | 
This file was generated from issues-lc-2012.txt on 5 April 2012.