Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.

Main Page/Security2017

From Web Commerce Interest Group
Jump to: navigation, search

These are some ideas for a security task force scope within the IG. This is a draft in development by Ken Mealey and Ian Jacobs.

Questions? Contact Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>.

Goals

  • Consistent with the WPIG Charter, help assess that deliverables of the Web Payments Working Group may be used to make secure payments.
  • Through trusted assessments and review, provide assurances to ecosystem stakeholders about the ability to use the APIs securely.
  • Encourage specification implementers to adopt security best practices to protect user data.

Discussion Scope

  • Assessment of deliverables of the Web Payments Working Group

Out of Scope

  • Digital Offers
  • Digital Receipts
  • Strong Authentication / FIDO integration

Tactics for Developing Assessments

  • Solidify assessment methodology
    • Research/leverage how EMVCo, PCI, FIDO and X9 do security reviews.
  • Recruit qualified reviewers
    • Work with the Web Security IG
    • Hire a form to perform a security evaluation
    • Encourage review by other organizations with similar interests in security (e.g., PCI, EMV, FIDO)
    • Request that W3C Member organizations implementing the specification share their own security evaluations.

Deliverables

  • Assessments
    • Web Security IG review (first requested January 2017).
    • Security Evaluation Report from a firm specializing in security evaluations
    • Evaluation / public statement by PCI and other affiliates
  • Translation of assessments
    • Into concrete comments on WPWG deliverables
    • Into best practices in the developer portal

Candidate Topics

  • Digital Signatures on PaymentRequest or PaymentResponse
  • End-to-End Encryption for Payment Instrument Details
  • Tokenization for Payment Instruments
  • Relation to PCI scope (and whether we can do better than status quo)