W3C Interaction

CC/PP Patent Disclosures

Stephane Boyera: July 24, 2003
Kazuhiro Kitagawa: May 31, 2002
Revised: August 7 2002, August 22 2002, July 24 2003


IPR Disclosures

This document lists patent disclosures and license commitments by W3C Members relating to the CC/PP Working Group andDI Working Group. The statements are provided by members of the CC/PP and DI Working Group as required by W3C process.

W3C does not take a position regarding the validity or scope of any intellectual property right or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology, nor the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available. Copyright of the CC/PP document and other WG deliverables is vested in the W3C.

Both the CC/PP Working Group and DI Working Group are Royalty-Free Groups as defined in W3C's Current Patent Practice.

Summary of patent statements for CC/PP: Structure and Vocabularies

This table summarizes patent statements for CC/PP that were made by CC/PP WG members in good or bad standing. Members were asked to provide patent disclosures and licensing statements for Essential Claims in the CC/PP specification. The 'license summary' column is a W3C Team characterization of the Member's statement into one of three general types of licenses: 1) Royalty-free, 2) Reasonable and non-discriminatory terms (RAND), or 3) no license offer because the Member claims it has no relevant patents. Members who offered a royalty free license were not required to declare patents. This summary is not offered to suggest the exact licensing terms. The precise terms of any licence, however, are governed entirely by the Member's statement. Please note that the links to the original IPR statements are only available to W3C members, but the statements themselves are available below.

Summary of CC/PP Patent Statements from CC/PP WG and DI WG members
Member Patent declaration License Summary

License statement

good standing
Baltimore Technologies None declared No license Based upon our current knowledge, and without making an exhaustive search, we do not have essential patent claims relating to this proposal.(Member Only Link)

yes

Ericsson None declared No license Based upon our current knowledge, and without making an exhaustive search, we do not have essential patent claims relating to this proposal.

(Member Only Link)

yes

Fujitsu None declared No license Based upon our current knowledge, and without making an exhaustive search, we do not have essential patent claims relating to this proposal.

(Member Only Link)

no

HP None declared No license Based upon our current knowledge, and without making an exhaustive search, we do not have essential patent claims relating to this proposal.

(Member Only Link)

yes

Nokia None declared RF
Regarding Essential claims in respect of the

 CC/PP: Structure and Vocabularies specification

in W3C standardisation, to the extent those Essential claims
are included into the final

 CC/PP: Structure and Vocabularies specification

in W3C standards, Nokia and its Affiliates agrees not to
assert those claims in Nokia patents that are technically
necessary to implement those parts of the final

 CC/PP: Structure and Vocabularies specification

against any other party in respect of its implementation of
the specification, provided that the party relying on this
commitment agrees not to assert patents against Nokia or its
Affiliates.

(Member Only Link)

yes

Panasonic None declared No license Based upon our current knowledge, and without making an exhaustive search, we do not have essential patent claims relating to this proposal.

(Member Only Link)

yes

SAP None declared No license Based upon our current knowledge, and without making an exhaustive search, we do not have essential patent claims relating to this proposal.

(Member Only Link)

yes

SBC None declared No license Based upon our current knowledge, and without making an exhaustive search, we do not have essential patent claims relating to this proposal.

(member only link)


yes

Volantis None declared No

License

To the best of my personal knowledge, as the Advisory Committee representative for Volantis Systems Ltd ("Volantis"), Volantis has no essential patents related to Composite Capability/Preference Profiles (CC/PP) Structure and Vocabularies.

(Member Only Link)

yes
Sony None

declared

No License [X] To the best of my personal knowledge, my organization has no patents essential to the above deliverables.

(Team only Link)

yes
MobileAware None declared No License [X] To the best of my personal knowledge, my organization has no patents essential to the above deliverables.

(Team only Link)

yes
NTT Docomo None declared No license [X] To the best of my personal knowledge, my organization has no patents essential to the above deliverables.

(Team only Link)

yes
Sun Microsystem None declared No license [X] To the best of my personal knowledge, my organization has no patents essential to the above deliverables.

(Team only Link)

yes
Boeing None declared No license [X] To the best of my personal knowledge, my organization has no patents essential to the above deliverables.

(Team only Link)

yes
IBM None declared No license [X] To the best of my personal knowledge, my organization has no patents essential to the above deliverables.

(Team only Link)

yes
Sky Think System None declared No license [X] To the best of my personal knowledge, my organization has no patents essential to the above deliverables.

(Team only Link)

no
Inria None declared No license [X] To the best of my personal knowledge, my organization has no patents essential to the above deliverables.

(Team only Link)

yes

Stephane Boyera, Kazuhiro Kitagawa, $Author: boyera $ $Date: 2002/08/27 03:22:39 $