ISSUE-84: translate ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages
Indic languages - translate
translate ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- MLW-LT Standard Draft
- Raised by:
- David Filip
- Opened on:
- 2013-01-18
- Description:
- See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0055.html
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2013-02-20)
- Re: [agenda] MLW-LT WG call 18th Feb 2013 15.00 UTC (from joerg@bioloom.de on 2013-02-18)
- RE: [agenda] MLW-LT WG call 18th Feb 2013 15.00 UTC (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-02-18)
- [agenda] MLW-LT WG call 18th Feb 2013 15.00 UTC (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-18)
- Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (from schandra@deity.gov.in on 2013-02-18)
- Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-18)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-12)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-11)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-07)
- Re: [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-03)
- Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (from shaunm@gnome.org on 2013-01-28)
- [Minutes and questions+comments] MLW-LT minutes 2013-01-28 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
- RE: New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from sgladkoff@logrus.ru on 2013-01-28)
- New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
- [ISSUE-109]: disambiguation ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [ACTION-418] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-28)
- Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from naoto.nishio@ul.ie on 2013-01-27)
- [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-27)
- Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-22)
- Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-01-21 and "sheperds" ... (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-21)
- Re: [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-01-21)
- [ISSUE-84]: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages, was: Re: ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian languages plus new comments on www-international list (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-01-18)
- mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-84 (Indic langauges): ITS 2.0 requirements w.r.t Indian [Indic] languages [MLW-LT Standard Draft] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-01-18)
Related notes:
Revise by D.Lewis to address only translate data category issue, with separate issues now created for localisation note and disambiguation in Indic languages
David Lewis, 21 Jan 2013, 11:55:13RESOLUTION: rejected
see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0178.html
RESOLUTION: rejected
David Lewis, 18 Feb 2013, 01:47:26CHANGE-TYPE: none
David Lewis, 18 Feb 2013, 01:47:41COMMENTER-RESPONSE: satisfied
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Feb/0032.html
DECISION-DETAILS: It was agreed that this issue did not require a change to the specification. Though specifying sub-type of translation, e.g. transliteration in this case, at the requirements stage there was no uptake by implementors in addressing these requirements, see;
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt-comments/2013Jan/0181.html
Display change log