ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation

ITS RDF Ontology creation

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Various MLW-LT best practices documents

Raised by:

Felix Sasaki

Opened on:

2013-02-25

Description:

Dave started an ITS RDF Ontology. See
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/ITS-RDF_mapping#Ontology_.28DRAFT.29
This is useful for the NIF conversion.

There was an offline discussion about this, including Dave, Leroy, Sebastian and I.

Some thoughts about the ontology current at
http://www.w3.org/International/multilingualweb/lt/wiki/ITS-RDF_mapping#Ontology_.28DRAFT.29

- the ontology uses various RDF classes that are not defined, e.g. "itstype:its-taConfidence.type" is identified as a class via
"rdf:type itstype:its-taConfidence.type"
So *if* one want to use "itstype:its-taConfidence.type" as a class, you'd need also
itstype:its-taConfidence.type rdf:type rdf:Class

- classes are normally written in upper case, so
"its-taConfidence.type" would be
"Its-taConfidence.type"

- As said in the offline thread (sorry for the repetition, guys), I would not define such classes at all. It would be sufficient to define actually no class - just use NIF URIs, and then have statements like this

someNIFBasedSubjectUri
its:locQualityIssueComment[1] "'c'es' is unknown. Could be 'c'est'";
its:locQualityIssueEnabled[1]="yes" ;
its:locQualityIssueSeverity[1] "50";
its:locQualityIssueType "misspelling".

The RDF predicates would take as a domain a NIF URI, and as the range an XML literal (or HTML literal, if we use RDF 1.1).
This approach has also the advantage that you can convert the test suite output easily to RDF "instance" data.

- Felix

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Bled Issues review G4 results (from mauricio.delolmo@linguaserve.com on 2013-05-07)
2. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-24)
3. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-04-24)
4. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-24)
5. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-04-24)
6. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-19)
7. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-19)
8. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2013-04-19)
9. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2013-04-18)
10. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-04-18)
11. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-18)
12. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-17)
13. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-04-17)
14. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-17)
15. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from hellmann@informatik.uni-leipzig.de on 2013-04-17)
16. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-17)
17. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-17)
18. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-17)
19. Re: agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-04-17)
20. agenda+ referencing ontology (Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft]) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-17)
21. Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft] (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-04-17)
22. Re: ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft] (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-04-17)
23. [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-04-03 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-04)
24. [Agenda] DRAFT MLW-LT call 3 April, noon UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-04-03)
25. ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft] (from jirka@kosek.cz on 2013-03-29)
26. Re: [Agenda] MLW-LT call Wednesday 27 February, 1 p.m. UTC (from joerg@bioloom.de on 2013-02-27)
27. [Agenda] MLW-LT call Wednesday 27 February, 1 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-27)
28. Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-02-27)
29. Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-26)
30. Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-26)
31. Re: [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-25)
32. [Issue-63] New value for "Values for the Localization Quality Issue Type": "conformance" Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from David.Filip@ul.ie on 2013-02-25)
33. [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-25 and action for implementers / review dry run (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-25)
34. AW: [Agenda] MLW-LT WG 25 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from Clemens.Weins@cocomore.com on 2013-02-25)
35. [Agenda] MLW-LT WG 25 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-25)
36. mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-119: ITS RDF Ontology creation [MLW-LT Standard Draft] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-02-25)

Related notes:

Display change log