ISSUE-110: change to langRule: precedence of xml:lang and lang

change to langRule: precedence of xml:lang and lang

State:
CLOSED
Product:
MLW-LT Standard Draft
Raised by:
Felix Sasaki
Opened on:
2013-01-23
Description:
See
http://www.w3.org/2013/01/23-mlw-lt-irc#T11-36-22
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: ISSUE-110: Draft note (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-22)
  2. Re: ISSUE-110: Draft note (from jirka@kosek.cz on 2013-02-22)
  3. Re: ISSUE-110: Draft note (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-22)
  4. Re: [agenda] MLW-LT WG call 18th Feb 2013 15.00 UTC (from joerg@bioloom.de on 2013-02-18)
  5. RE: [agenda] MLW-LT WG call 18th Feb 2013 15.00 UTC (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-02-18)
  6. [agenda] MLW-LT WG call 18th Feb 2013 15.00 UTC (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-18)
  7. Re: ISSUE-110: Draft note (from philr@vistatec.ie on 2013-02-18)
  8. ISSUE-110: Draft note (from jirka@kosek.cz on 2013-02-18)
  9. Re: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from jirka@kosek.cz on 2013-02-18)
  10. Re: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-04 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-12)
  11. RE: [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-04 (from pablo.nieto@linguaserve.com on 2013-02-12)
  12. [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-11 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
  13. [Minutes] MLW-LT call 2013-02-04 (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
  14. Re: [Agenda] MLW-LT call 11 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from olaf@stefanov.at on 2013-02-11)
  15. [Agenda] MLW-LT call 11 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-11)
  16. Fwd: [Agenda] MLW-LT call 4 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from dave.lewis@cs.tcd.ie on 2013-02-04)
  17. [Agenda] MLW-LT call 4 February, 3 p.m. UTC (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-02-01)
  18. RE: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-31)
  19. Re: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-31)
  20. RE: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from marcis.pinnis@Tilde.lv on 2013-01-31)
  21. RE: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-30)
  22. RE: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-30)
  23. Re: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from finnle@tcd.ie on 2013-01-30)
  24. Re: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from finnle@tcd.ie on 2013-01-30)
  25. Re: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from finnle@tcd.ie on 2013-01-29)
  26. Re: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from arle.lommel@dfki.de on 2013-01-28)
  27. RE: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from ysavourel@enlaso.com on 2013-01-28)
  28. Re: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
  29. Re: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from shaunm@gnome.org on 2013-01-28)
  30. RE: New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from sgladkoff@logrus.ru on 2013-01-28)
  31. Re: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from finnle@tcd.ie on 2013-01-28)
  32. New dial in details to come (Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-28)
  33. Re: [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from naoto.nishio@ul.ie on 2013-01-27)
  34. [Minutes] Prague f2f (draft) and Monday call (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-27)
  35. Re: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-25)
  36. Re: question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from jirka@kosek.cz on 2013-01-25)
  37. question on issue-110 (xml:lang vs. lang) (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2013-01-25)
  38. mlw-lt-track-ISSUE-110: change to langRule: precedence of xml:lang and lang [MLW-LT Standard Draft] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-01-23)

Related notes:

[fsasaki]: DECISION-DETAILS: borderline substantive

24 Jan 2013, 11:37:40

Following note added:

<note>
<p>Please note that this section defines how to use ITS in XHTML content
which is directly served to Web browsers. Such XHTML is very often sent
with a wrong media type and parsed as HTML not as XML in Web browsers.
In such case it is more robust and safer to use HTML-like syntax for ITS
metadata.</p>
<p>However when XHTML is not used as a delivery but rather as an exchange
or storage format all XML features can be used in XHTML and it's advised
to use XML syntax for ITS metadata.</p>
</note>

Jirka Kosek, 20 Feb 2013, 09:57:57

[fsasaki]: RESOLUTION: rejected

8 Apr 2013, 10:20:50

[fsasaki]: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: satisfied, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-multilingualweb-lt/2013Feb/0220.html

8 Apr 2013, 10:21:02

[fsasaki]: CHANGE-TYPE: editorial

8 Apr 2013, 10:21:18

[fsasaki]: DECISION-DETAILS: a clarifying note was added to the section "Using ITS markup in XHTML"

8 Apr 2013, 10:22:13

Display change log ATOM feed

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 110.html,v 1.1 2014-01-21 15:46:09 kahan Exp $