ISSUE-2336: Last Call Comment: SVG fragment identifiers - ok to have the same SVGViewAttribute twice?
multifrags
Last Call Comment: SVG fragment identifiers - ok to have the same SVGViewAttribute twice?
- State:
- RAISED
- Product:
- SVG 1.1 F2 Last Call
- Raised by:
- Erik Dahlström
- Opened on:
- 2010-06-28
- Description:
- 17.3.2 SVG fragment identifiers
Is it ok to have the same SVGViewAttribute twice in the one view?
If yes, how is this interpreted?
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2010May/0026.html
Original mail:
http://www.w3.org/mid/201006271246.58102.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de - Related Actions Items:
ACTION-2813 on Chris Lilley to Propose wording for ISSUE-2336 to say if it is malformed it doesn't have an effect - due 2010-07-13, closed- Related emails:
- SVG/profiles/1.1F2/DoC disco.xsl,1.4,1.5 dump.html,1.3,1.4 (from cvsmail@w3.org on 2011-05-04)
- Minutes Paris F2F day 1 (September 3, 2010) (from anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au on 2010-09-04)
- SVG/profiles/1.1F2/DoC getxml.html,NONE,1.1 disco.xsl,1.3,1.4 dump.html,1.2,1.3 dump.xml,1.1,NONE (from cvsmail@w3.org on 2010-08-02)
- SVG/profiles/1.1F2/DoC disco.xsl,1.2,1.3 dump.html,1.1,1.2 (from cvsmail@w3.org on 2010-07-29)
- Re: [SVG1.1F2 LC] mainly previous open issues... (from chris@w3.org on 2010-07-26)
- Re: [SVG1.1F2 LC] mainly previous open issues... (from Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de on 2010-07-26)
- Re: [SVG1.1F2 LC] mainly previous open issues... (from chris@w3.org on 2010-07-26)
- SVG/profiles/1.1F2/master linking.html,1.18,1.19 (from cvsmail@w3.org on 2010-07-26)
- Minutes July 6 2010 SVG WG telcon (from anthony.grasso@cisra.canon.com.au on 2010-07-07)
- ISSUE-2336: SVG fragment identifiers - ok to have the same SVGViewAttribute twice? [SVG 1.1 F2 Last Call] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-06-28)
Related notes:
ACTION: Accept
Chris Lilley, 26 Jul 2010, 15:01:59CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial
Chris Lilley, 26 Jul 2010, 15:02:24RESOLUTION: See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2010Jul/0080.html
Chris Lilley, 26 Jul 2010, 15:03:49COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept
Chris Lilley, 26 Jul 2010, 18:10:30Display change log