ACTION-196: Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs
Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs
- State:
- closed
- Person:
- Vladimir Levantovsky
- Due on:
- February 17, 2016
- Created on:
- February 10, 2016
- Related emails:
- Minutes, 02 March 2016 WebFonts call (from chris@w3.org on 2016-03-02)
- Re: Telcon reminder and agenda for Wed. March 2 (from rsheeter@google.com on 2016-03-01)
- Telcon reminder and agenda for Wed. March 2 (from Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com on 2016-03-01)
- RE: WOFF-ACTION-196: Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs (from Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com on 2016-02-18)
- Re: WOFF-ACTION-196: Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs (from rsheeter@google.com on 2016-02-18)
- RE: WOFF-ACTION-196: Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs (from Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com on 2016-02-18)
- Re: WOFF-ACTION-196: Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs (from rsheeter@google.com on 2016-02-17)
- RE: WOFF-ACTION-196: Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs (from Vladimir.Levantovsky@monotype.com on 2016-02-16)
- Telcon Minutes Feb 10, 2016 (from rsheeter@google.com on 2016-02-10)
- WOFF-ACTION-196: Review treatment of empty glyphs vs 0-contour glyphs (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2016-02-10)
Related notes:
See https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webfonts-wg/2016Feb/0019.html for details
Vladimir Levantovsky, 17 Feb 2016, 14:37:20Display change log.