This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Section 1.3: Change exception to error handling as the concept of business exception is above WS-CDL. Look to requirements for these other specifications rather than dependencies. Social and technical aspect exists behind this suggestion. Section 2.4.8 Change exception to error conditions. Applies in all cases and references throughout the document. Section 2.5.2 An interaction activity forms the atom of composition, where multiple interacts are combined to form a Choreography, which can be used in different business contexts. A business collaboration that does not have atomic semantics, SHOULD be modeled as several interactions between participants instead of one interaction. Please explain the meaning of this item. The Channel through which an interaction occurs is used to determine whether to enlist the interaction with an already initiated Choreography or to initiate a new Choreography. Within a Choreography, two or more related interactions MAY be grouped to form a logical conversation. The Channel through which an interaction occurs is used to determine whether to enlist the interaction with an already initiated conversation or to initiate a new conversation. Does this infer that the channel is the correlation mechanism for multiple interactions for composition? Please explain. In this section in two different parts, you infer that the alignment occurs with the roles or the participants. Which one is it as it relates to information exchange and state variables? This seems confusing or perhaps further clarification is required.
Not an editorial issue. needs more discussion.