This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
> ****c. QOS, reliability and security > Section 2.2: > Security and reliability. David, whether or not security and > reliability or used is defined at the business level and will be > provided to the choreography. These type of QOS attributes are related > to business-level agreements. Suggest deletion, unless you wish to > point to the business semantics that bound that. > Section 3.4.1.1, 3.5.2, 3.5.7: > Reference specifically Issue I-02 and I-03 in Model Overview. > Monica. Reference to SOAP headers, security, QoS, this is expanding > the scope into the binding, converse to our mission statement. > David. I think we have different interpretations on what our scope > mission is ... we need to discuss and the team to agree. > mm2: I believe these are outside the scope of choreography and may be > understood at the business semantic level and/or a lower level. ****
Proposal from Charlton: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2004Oct/att-0054/qos_bindings.pdf This issue remains unresolved until the Description Working Group (WSDL2.0) resolves the issues related to F&P and Compositors documented in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2004Oct/0001.html
SRT - Was talked about at the F2F. RECOMMENDATION - Due to Charlton's proposals at the F2F this should be marked as CLOSE FIXED.